Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

The first step towards an international instrument to abolish surrogacy.

169 replies

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 03/07/2026 08:26

"A group of states at the United Nations has launched a political declaration calling for an international moratorium on surrogacy, marking a significant first step in what its supporters hope will become a global abolitionist framework."

UN States Launch Political Declaration for Global Surrogacy Moratorium ━ The European Conservative

"That is a long road. But for those who oppose the buying and selling of babies and the exploitation of women, the fact that states have now placed the issue formally on the UN track is already the point: the market is global, and the response is beginning to become global, too."

I not sure I have any faith in the UN anymore, but hopefully this will gain some traction, I can see it clashing with the Global Left's Utopian ideals though.

UN States Launch Political Declaration for Global Surrogacy Moratorium

The declaration is not legally binding, but its promoters see it as the first step towards an international instrument to abolish surrogacy.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/un-states-launch-political-declaration-for-global-surrogacy-moratorium/

OP posts:
Marycontrarygarden · 04/07/2026 16:44

WhereYouLeftIt · 04/07/2026 16:42

Are you assuming every family member is equally loved, every family member is accorded equal respect, and no family member is vulnerable? That because money is not involved, neither is pressure?

Let's go through some family scenarios then.

Golden Child daughter is not only Too Posh To Push, she doesn't want to 'get fat' with a pregnancy and it will interfere with her busy work schedule. Scapegoat daughter is pressured into carrying and bearing the child. The entire pregnancy is spent with her every movement, everything she eats/drinks being closely monitored and controlled by her Golden Sister, Narcissistic Mother and Enabler Father. She is not included in the post-birth family photograph because the child isn't hers, she's only the aunt. Photo is 'Mother', Doting Grandparents and baby. Her PND from having the child she carried and bore is ignored, she is constantly nagged for being 'a downer' and expected to 'babysit' whilst Golden Child Sister continues to galavant about.

Gay brother persuades childless sister to get pregnant with her own eggs by artificial insemination from his partner, because then he will also have a genetic link to 'his' child. So, not only does she carry and bear the child, she is the actual mother. Brother had promised that she will be a big feature in the child's life, but then there are tensions (sister had not expected to feel this overwhelming protective love) but the paperwork has already been done and legally her child is his. Sibling relationship breaks down and brother/partner/child move several hundred miles away, ostensibly 'for job opportunities'.

Two female cousins, one with a medical condition that prevents her carrying her own child. Other cousin actually volunteers to carry child, having had two successfully and healthy pregnancies herself and really wants her cousin to have her own family. IVF takes place and is implanted into volunteer cousin. There are unexpected complications with this pregnancy and volunteer cousin is left with birth injuries that curtail her own life and mean she has to give up her job, impacting her family financially. Receiving cousin feels guilty and cannot face seeing her now-injured cousin. Wider family breakdown between aunts / uncles / grandparents ensue.

I could come up with more, but I'm sure this gives a flavour of the absolute can of worms such a surrogacy can open. And I haven't even glanced in the direction of how the child will feel about their origins and how they will feel about having been passed from one family member to another like some sort of possession / favour, and how that would affect how they feel about their birth mother, legal mother, the wider family who colluded in it - and most importantly, how they feel about themselves.

Are you writing some shit fiction novel because 🙄

Marycontrarygarden · 04/07/2026 16:46

JuliettaCaeser · 04/07/2026 11:11

Surprised to find myself a European conservative but here we are.

A family member was extolling how marvellous it was her friend met a gay couple with a baby from a surrogate in Columbia at a wedding recently. I found it appalling not cause for celebration.

Why? The woman needed money. How has it got anything to do with you?

JuliettaCaeser · 04/07/2026 17:03

Would you want to give away your baby for money ?

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 04/07/2026 17:32

Great contribution to the debate Mary, we're all so much clearer on the issue now, thanks. 🙄

OP posts:
WhereYouLeftIt · 04/07/2026 17:36

"Mind your own business."

"Are you writing some shit fiction novel because 🙄"

"Why? The woman needed money. How has it got anything to do with you?"

Coming across as quite defensive there, Marycontrarygarden (and believing attack is the best form of defence).

ElenOfTheWays · 04/07/2026 17:46

ThisOneLife · 04/07/2026 14:01

Except the baby often has no genetic link to the person who carried them.

I think you mean the WOMAN who created them.
Unless you really have no idea what a pregnancy actually is.
If so, I'm not sure you're qualified to be a part of this discussion.

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 18:10

ElenOfTheWays · 04/07/2026 17:46

I think you mean the WOMAN who created them.
Unless you really have no idea what a pregnancy actually is.
If so, I'm not sure you're qualified to be a part of this discussion.

Arenyou saying that if someone believes that trans men can get pregnant (because they can), then they shouldn't be a part of any discussion about pregnancy? Even if they are capable of conception themselves?

ShishKofte · 04/07/2026 18:36

Marycontrarygarden · 04/07/2026 16:43

Mind your own business.

Is this your go to for other forms of abuse and exploitation? Or just this one because it suits you?

While I absolutely feel for women who can't bear their own children, surrogacy is still abhorrent. Even the fluffy 'its for my sister' stuff absolutely lays down the red carpet for the disgusting situation in COVID - rows and rows of 'commissioned' (urgh) babies in hotel rooms, many were abandoned because they were too old; surrogates in third world countires left with babies because the buyers refused them due to additional needs; birth mothers left with life changing injuries; young women being coerced to produce & sell babies by partners/families in third world countries for cash.

None of those are fiction.

iamfrustrated · 04/07/2026 18:37

JuliettaCaeser · 04/07/2026 17:03

Would you want to give away your baby for money ?

It depends on the situation surrounding its conception, surely?

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 18:38

I wouldn't see it as my baby if it wasnt genetically related to me and was planned to be raised by other people

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 19:24

ThisOneLife · 04/07/2026 14:04

Your entirely missing the fact that many of these babies are implanted as embryos and have NO getup link to the surrogate at all.

I’m really not, that doesn’t make it better, it means there are two women who were happy to give away a human to someone else without offering the child the protection it deserves.

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 19:25

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 18:38

I wouldn't see it as my baby if it wasnt genetically related to me and was planned to be raised by other people

That is one of the things that makes surrogacy so disgusting, a baby isn’t a product that you grow like a tomato, it’s grows in its mothers womb and is removed from her at birth, we do t even allow that for dogs.

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 19:28

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 19:25

That is one of the things that makes surrogacy so disgusting, a baby isn’t a product that you grow like a tomato, it’s grows in its mothers womb and is removed from her at birth, we do t even allow that for dogs.

It would be fine with the parents who very much wanted and likely already love them.

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 20:02

AnneLovesGilbert · 03/07/2026 13:34

It might be mutually agreeable to the adults but what about the wellbeing of the baby who is conceived in the knowledge he or she will be immediately removed from their mother with all the well evidenced trauma that brings? We don’t take puppies away from their mums at birth, why humans?

But the surrogate in most cases isn’t the mother? One of my friends has been a surrogate three times via ivf. The embryos were made by the parents and she just carried them. She sees it as the most rewarding thing she’s ever done. She’s helped make 3 beautiful families. I know it’s very nuanced subject and has been exploited in some countries but it can be a lovely thing as well.

Mountainlarch · 04/07/2026 20:12

@WhereYouLeftIt I totally agree, those are plausible scenarios.
For a while, my sister couldn't get pregnant, and I lived with a lot of guilt as I was trying to get pregnant with a second child. (All went well in the end and she has two children too). But at the time I wondered if I would have offered to be a surrogate mother. It was all theoretical: I had preeclampsia with my first pregnancy and my sister wouldn't have accepted me taking the risk. But yes, things can get complicated during childbirth, and even a selfless act of love within a family can have unintended consequences and create a lot of pain.

ElenOfTheWays · 04/07/2026 20:18

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 18:10

Arenyou saying that if someone believes that trans men can get pregnant (because they can), then they shouldn't be a part of any discussion about pregnancy? Even if they are capable of conception themselves?

What?
Only women get pregnant. Transmen ARE women and a pregnancy is more than just "carrying" a child. Which was actually my main point.

And, frankly, I seriously doubt anyone would want to use a transman as a surrogate nor would any transman want to be one so the issue would never arise.
FWIW I myself believe a transman can indeed get pregnant- because they are WOMEN.

ElenOfTheWays · 04/07/2026 20:30

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 20:02

But the surrogate in most cases isn’t the mother? One of my friends has been a surrogate three times via ivf. The embryos were made by the parents and she just carried them. She sees it as the most rewarding thing she’s ever done. She’s helped make 3 beautiful families. I know it’s very nuanced subject and has been exploited in some countries but it can be a lovely thing as well.

She did not "just carry them" this rhetoric is so dismissive and unhelpful.
She grew those children in her body. Her body created them - albeit from genetic material from another woman. Those babies were born knowing only her heartbeat, her feelings and her voice.
To paraphrase @Overworkedandknackered , she wasn't growing tomatoes - these are human beings not produce.

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 20:35

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 20:02

But the surrogate in most cases isn’t the mother? One of my friends has been a surrogate three times via ivf. The embryos were made by the parents and she just carried them. She sees it as the most rewarding thing she’s ever done. She’s helped make 3 beautiful families. I know it’s very nuanced subject and has been exploited in some countries but it can be a lovely thing as well.

And if the parents she sold those children to abuse them or murder them will she feel any responsibility for enabling that?

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 20:37

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 19:28

It would be fine with the parents who very much wanted and likely already love them.

ITS. NOT. ABOUT. WHAT. THE. ADULTS. WANT. Jesus fucking Christ, will no one put the best interests of the child first?

ScrollingLeaves · 04/07/2026 20:49

Cheese55 · 03/07/2026 13:31

I'm on the fence with non exploitative surrogacy but people will say pre natal bonding means the baby is harmed by severing that attachment at birth

This is what worries me. It is still too soon to know how babies this has happened to will feel or behave as they grow up.

I also am worried there might be baby farming going on, and some of buyers unsafe.

AnneLovesGilbert · 04/07/2026 20:50

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 20:02

But the surrogate in most cases isn’t the mother? One of my friends has been a surrogate three times via ivf. The embryos were made by the parents and she just carried them. She sees it as the most rewarding thing she’s ever done. She’s helped make 3 beautiful families. I know it’s very nuanced subject and has been exploited in some countries but it can be a lovely thing as well.

The woman who gives birth to the baby is the baby’s mother. You try telling the baby that his or her genetic material was other people’s.

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 21:51

AnneLovesGilbert · 04/07/2026 20:50

The woman who gives birth to the baby is the baby’s mother. You try telling the baby that his or her genetic material was other people’s.

i don’t agree. Genetically the baby is nothing to do with the surrogate. The babies went straight to their genetic parents and knew no different. All are happy thriving babies.

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 21:53

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 20:35

And if the parents she sold those children to abuse them or murder them will she feel any responsibility for enabling that?

I’m sure she would just as she would if she gave a baby up for adoption. She didn’t ‘sell’ them either. They paid for private medical care and that’s it.

Becuriousnotjudgemental1980 · 04/07/2026 21:56

ElenOfTheWays · 04/07/2026 20:30

She did not "just carry them" this rhetoric is so dismissive and unhelpful.
She grew those children in her body. Her body created them - albeit from genetic material from another woman. Those babies were born knowing only her heartbeat, her feelings and her voice.
To paraphrase @Overworkedandknackered , she wasn't growing tomatoes - these are human beings not produce.

Edited

And the father. The embryos were made from both parents so genetically nothing to do with her. She sees it very differently. I guess you have to have been in that situation to really know what it’s like. All the babies are thriving and the families are happy.

Lexibletheflexible · 04/07/2026 22:22

Overworkedandknackered · 04/07/2026 20:37

ITS. NOT. ABOUT. WHAT. THE. ADULTS. WANT. Jesus fucking Christ, will no one put the best interests of the child first?

The child would be fine. All children need are competent adults who love them to raise them. There is no reason to think parents by surrogacy can't be those people. Your outrage doesn't convince me.