Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU not wanting to use my savings on the house whilst I’m a SAHM?

35 replies

Yogarunningcoffee · Today 13:26

Hi ladies, im looking for some views on this money situation

I am currently a SAHM to my children, and plan to go back to work part time once they start school. Before having my first, DH & I saved up a pot of money to see me through the years I was at home. I topped it up quite heavily by being extra careful with my spending whilst i was pregnant.

DH does give me an ‘allowance’ every month & about 99% of it goes on the children (classes, clothes etc). The pot of money I saved up is for things like having my hair coloured, buying presents, the occasional hen do. Basically anything miscellaneous that I can’t cover in my monthly budget. I’m a few years in and I have been very careful with it so admittedly haven’t really had to touch it.

Anyway, we are at the point with our house now where we could do with a few thousand pounds to really get it finished off with all the finishing touches.

DH thinks I should use my some of my savings towards this but I’m not sure I agree. The purpose of the money was for me to be able to have some of extra cash of my own especially as even when the kids are at school I’m realistically never going to be able to save up any money again as I wouldn’t be going back into the same sort of job / salary.

I’m also a bit hesitant as DH bought himself a something last year (not a car) that cost more than my whole pot of savings. So I sort of feel like Im being penalized a bit for being careful with my money.

IABU for not wanting to use my savings towards the house? Or am I being selfish when DH currently financially supports me?

OP posts:
ACynicalDad · Today 14:12

Does he have a savings account too? How much goes into it these days? If his is also static then you could go halves, if his is being replenished then he can pay it.

Peonies12 · Today 14:12

That allowance concept is just ridiculous. I am pretty shocked you are sacrificing your financial independence, career prospects, promotion opportunities for an 'allowance'. All money should be pooled with equal access if one parent is SAH. It's not the 1950s. You are going to be in a difficult position if you split.

MrsCarson · Today 14:30

Yogarunningcoffee · Today 13:52

@UncharteredWaters he used part of his bonus for the expensive purchase

Just tell him you've earmarked your savings to buy a (whatever he bought himself last year) even if you don't want one, and you aren't ready to get one just yet.
He can't argue with that, after all it was good enough for him to blow his money on.

redskyAtNigh · Today 14:42

I think you are confusing the issue by the way you are describing the different pots of money.

There is (presumably) money that pays for rent/mortgage and all bills and essentials.

Then you have what you are calling an "allowance" but just sounds like a budgeted amount of money to spend on things for the children and things for you. In our house this sits in the same account as the bills money, but we still know that there is a certain amount of money there that we can spend on xyz up to a limit.

Then DH has savings, of which he has used some to buy personal items, and some for joint purposes (things for the house).

Then there is a pot of money that both you and DH saved towards but is for your use while you are not working. It sounds like you haven't spent much of this - i hope this is because the "allowance" covers so much of your personal items that you've never needed to, rather than you are living in rags and never get your hair cut (athough if this is the case, it woudl be your choice as you do have access to money).

Although this is framed as several lots of money it actually sounds like a lot of joint money just split in several pots. In this situation I'd spend the money on the house, but ask DH to help build the money up to its previous level. Unless there is something you particularly want to spend it on - which it doesn't sounds like there is? Seems a bit churlish to insist on keeping it when it could be used for the good of the family.

Sparrowsandbudgies · Today 14:47

Your whole set up is bizarre. If you’re a sahm you should have equal spending money and equal access to all income. Anything else is just taking the piss.

Stationbike · Today 15:23

Why are you paying for the children from your funds.
Your husband is a CF and a bit mean to boot.

Do not leave yourself penniless and honestly rthink about returning to work.

That he would be so cheeky as to even suggest this means he doesn't respect what you are giving up.

Are you paying into a pension while off?
Don't be foolish, so many women get caught out doing what you are doing.
Red flag.

Do you not have access to a joint account.
An allowance?
What the hell is this?
I cannot understand women giving up a salary for this 1950's bullshit.

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · Today 15:25

Thank fuck you are married eh?

ScaredButUnavoidable · Today 15:27

Yogarunningcoffee · Today 13:42

Pre giving up work, DH & I always had our own ‘spending money’ at the end of the month so the ‘allowance’ is a continuation of this really which I don’t have an issue with as it helps me budget and plan my month. The issue is using my savings towards things for the house.

Except you have to budget and spend your ”spending money” (allowance) on the children.

Does he spend his “spending money” on buying things that the children need too? Or does he get to spend it on himself?

Morepositivemum · Today 15:32

If you both have savings for nice things then the family money should be used for the house as you’re meant to be a team! If he has no savings then he needs to have his own pot for his nice stuff but I’ll take a guess and say he probably has one?

GCScot · Today 15:35

JoshLymanSwagger · Today 13:56

Well, technically OPs DH does go to work and earn the money that he shares with OP.

If it's an extra toy or ice cream that's one thing.
If it's a new pair of shoes, that's different.

No, I disagree with this

They've had children together, and made a joint decision to split the work required: he works outside of the home, she works within the home looking after the children. She shouldn't be financially penalised because his work generates money and hers doesn't.

Both of them having an equal amount of money each month for discretionary spending on non-essential items that they don't have to justify to each other is fine. What isn't fine is her having to use her 'allowance' for items for their children. Anything for their children should come out of pooled money

New posts on this thread. Refresh page