Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Another victory! For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers in prisons case

226 replies

TheNoWord · 19/06/2026 12:04

It’s just been on the news in Scotland. More to follow….

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
Alucard55 · 21/06/2026 07:27

ArabellaScott · 20/06/2026 09:25

To be fair, I did not have this as a gotcha on my bingo card, but it appears to be genuine:

Are these people seriously suggesting that biological women are locked up with men. And the worst of men at that.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/06/2026 08:48

RhannionKPSS · 21/06/2026 01:31

Just to remind everyone about Kate Coleman from Keep Prisons Single Sex who worked so hard for so long. Thank you Kate if you are on here, or if anyone can let her know that please know you haven’t been forgotten. This is your victory too KPSS

Yes, definitely ❤️ she did.

ArabellaScott · 21/06/2026 09:10

Alucard55 · 21/06/2026 07:27

Are these people seriously suggesting that biological women are locked up with men. And the worst of men at that.

Yes. For inclusivity.

GreenFootstool · 21/06/2026 09:29

SwirlyGates · 20/06/2026 20:24

I wouldn't propose that as an answer. The obvious response would be, "Don't go to prison, women, then you can't get locked up with transwomen."

No the obvious response is that women should be safe wherever they are and protected from violent men, especially when locked up by government agencies who have control over those spaces and the women have none.

Hospitals, prisons, mental health institutions, immigration detention centres, police stations, court cells....

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2026 09:34

I am still dumbfounded that my Government have spent all this time and taxpayer's money to fight for men to be held in the women's prison estate. It's utterly, utterly bizarre how they haven't had a 'are we the baddies here?' moment.

Can you imagine where we'd be now without the sterling efforts of FWS, Kate Colman et al?

Even now, it's going to take further legal action to force the SPS and SG to follow the law as they are still dragging their feet.

Wishesandhorses · 21/06/2026 09:34

ArabellaScott · 21/06/2026 09:10

Yes. For inclusivity.

In about the same way cows and goats are 'included' in the T Rex paddock in Jurassic Park. It's about on the level of how these people view women.

ArabellaScott · 21/06/2026 09:38
Some Of You May Die Lord Farquaad GIF by slicedbread

I'm sure that this person considers the risks to transmen worth it to support her personal convictions.

Waitwhat23 · 21/06/2026 09:39

ArabellaScott · 21/06/2026 09:10

Yes. For inclusivity.

It's essentially state sanctioned punitive rape of vulnerable women because institutions so fear the ire of groups lobbying to remove women's rights.

It's moral cowardice by our elected representatives and institutions.

SwirlyGates · 21/06/2026 09:40

GreenFootstool · 21/06/2026 09:29

No the obvious response is that women should be safe wherever they are and protected from violent men, especially when locked up by government agencies who have control over those spaces and the women have none.

Hospitals, prisons, mental health institutions, immigration detention centres, police stations, court cells....

I meant the obvious response from TRAs, not the obvious (to us) response.

Everyone should be safe in prison (and hospitals, detention centres, also the constantly-debated toilets and changing rooms), and this includes all vulnerable men. Gay men, physically weak men, learning-disabled men - if they are at risk they are, or should be, protected from other men. No one suggests chucking these men in with the women to protect them. Yet so many claim this is the solution for TiM.

Alucard55 · 21/06/2026 13:34

I obviously don't know for sure but I do strongly suspect that if you asked 100 trans identified females would you like to be housed in the male or female estate they would overwhelmingly say the female estate.

There was a TIF on GMB a while back arguing that there shouldn't be a blanket ban on TIM being housed in the female estate and it should instead be on a case by case basis. She was asked so would she be happy to be housed in the male estate. Her tone completely changed.

I'll try to find it.

Seethlaw · 21/06/2026 13:52

Alucard55 · 21/06/2026 13:36

I tried to listen but Jaxon's hypocrisy and selfcenteredness made me angry and I had to stop 😡Ugh! Maybe they don't mind the idea of being housed in a men's jail someday, but I certainly do, and I doubt I'm the only transman of this opinion! Also, way to throw women under the bus, Jaxon! Guess what, they are people too, can you see them behind the sentence?

EmpressaurusKitty · 21/06/2026 14:38

It’s worth getting to the end, @Seethlaw, because Jaxon gets thoroughly tangled up in her own arguments.

Seethlaw · 21/06/2026 14:58

EmpressaurusKitty · 21/06/2026 14:38

It’s worth getting to the end, @Seethlaw, because Jaxon gets thoroughly tangled up in her own arguments.

Took you to your word, watched the rest.

Indeed, their one and only argument seems to be: "case-by-case basis", which surprises me, because they honestly don't seem to realise that transwomen are most likely to get bad outcomes in such a process.

Like Rhona said, there are plenty of other vulnerable men being put into special circumstances to protect them in men's prisons. And as Jaxon accidentally agrees to, men as a class are dangerous to women. So why Jaxon imagines that a case-by-case basis would ever come out in favour of the transwoman going into a women's jail, kinda baffles me.

PoliticalTerfery · 22/06/2026 03:30

RhannionKPSS · 21/06/2026 01:31

Just to remind everyone about Kate Coleman from Keep Prisons Single Sex who worked so hard for so long. Thank you Kate if you are on here, or if anyone can let her know that please know you haven’t been forgotten. This is your victory too KPSS

I'm not sure if she's still on twitter but FWS specifically thanked her a couple of days ago for all her work on this
https://x.com/ForWomenScot/status/2067983371553099878

For Women Scotland (@ForWomenScot) on X

We'd like to thank all those who have worked on prisons here and across the UK, raising awareness and being a voice for the vulnerable women in jail. If we try to name check you all, we will miss someone, but special thanks are due to Kate Coleman who...

https://x.com/ForWomenScot/status/2067983371553099878

Igmum · 22/06/2026 18:39

Wishesandhorses · 19/06/2026 13:19

The 'suicide' bit is an irritating bit of fog -

I wish they didn't keep focusing solely on the 'rights' of men with gender identities. It's not the whole truth. When it comes back that 'there's no Article 8 right' (without limits) etc with nothing further, it suggests that ok, the right is needed and that's the next step.

When the reality actually is that women have Article 8 rights too and the sex segregation of prisons is necessary for the massive majority of prisoners who aren't men with gender beliefs.

The only way to maintain equal article 8 rights is to provide additional units for these men; to meet their wishes and needs without depriving women of privacy, dignity, safety and legal protections.

We are I think going to see an attempt made to remove women and gay rights from the Equality Act. I suppose at least Reform want to remove everybodys rights and protections equally.

Agree but tbf I believe they explicitly acknowledged that (even with a suicidal TiM), they shouldn’t house him in the women’s estate because women prisoners have their own needs and vulnerabilities. I was very pleased to see that. Looks like judges are finally and belatedly realising that women are human too.

SternJoyousBeev2 · 23/06/2026 13:45

I have been eagerly awaiting this judgement and I'm thrilled that FWS have won (again). I tuned in live and was entertained and infuriated in equal measure. Aidan O'Neill appeared to have no more fucks to give as he tore apart the piss poor arguments of the opposing team so I am very happy that he prevailed despite his challenging approach.

EasternStandard · 23/06/2026 14:16

Amazing!

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 23/06/2026 19:43

Does anyone know how the Scottish Green's are reacting to this. I imagine Maggie Chapperson's face is more miserable then ever. 😂

Alucard55 · 23/06/2026 22:48

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 23/06/2026 19:43

Does anyone know how the Scottish Green's are reacting to this. I imagine Maggie Chapperson's face is more miserable then ever. 😂

Also very curious as to how the TRA's will react to this.

EmpressaurusKitty · 24/06/2026 02:05

Alucard55 · 23/06/2026 22:48

Also very curious as to how the TRA's will react to this.

Trans Reddit are furious. Although obviously not furious on behalf of women prisoners who have been locked up with violent men.

RhannionKPSS · 25/06/2026 14:43

Question asked about the judgement at FMQ earlier on , FM said the judgement has be enacted, the SPS have withdrawn their “ letter” do it looks like the men are out and have been since Tuesday as was thought

GailBlancheViola · 25/06/2026 14:55

RhannionKPSS · 25/06/2026 14:43

Question asked about the judgement at FMQ earlier on , FM said the judgement has be enacted, the SPS have withdrawn their “ letter” do it looks like the men are out and have been since Tuesday as was thought

Excellent news.

It should never have happened in the first place though and that is what is so utterly disgraceful in all this.

Rednorth · 25/06/2026 15:08

SwirlyGates · 19/06/2026 12:18

I haven't read it all, but here are a few quotes:

Insofar as the Prisons Guidance allows SPS to accommodate trans prisoners in
prisons for the opposite biological sex, it is in conflict with the requirement that prison accommodation be provided separately for men and women. That constitutes a mis-statement of the law.

There is no positive obligation, in general terms, based on Article 2 or Article 3, to accommodate a trans prisoner in a prison for the opposite biological sex.

It is possible that, in an exceptional individual case, in a situation where there is a threat to life through suicide, it may be necessary to consider an argument that accommodation in a prison for the opposite biological sex is necessary and that rule 126 should be disapplied. Whether that could be achieved compatibly with the requirements of the EA 2010 cannot be determined in the abstract.

(Does that mean that if the TiM threatens suicide they may get placed in the women's prison?)

In all the circumstances, the Prisons Guidance is unlawful and the petitioner is
entitled to orders for declarator and reduction.

Yay.

My attitude, if they're threatening suicide, then they should be sent to a secure mental facility, not just sent to an opposite sex prison.

Swipe left for the next trending thread