I'm really shocked that Ruhama includes transwomen as 'women'.
It is sometimes dismissed as a prudish anti-sex arm of the Catholic church, because as far as I know it grew out of a Catholic-origin social outreach group in the 1980s, and it is anti-prostitution.
I've always considered it one of the few women's groups that was resolutely by and for women.
Given that they support very marginalised women - e.g. trafficked sex workers, - the idea that they don't give them a women-only service is disappointing.
Obviously marginalised, trafficked transgender sex workers deserve support too - what a shame the trans community doesn't divert some of their energy into helping them.
I'm surprised that Rumana submitted something to the council who were trying to evict Barbie K. I can only surmise that they are responding to the fact that he is a deeply damaged man, who needs - even if we don't feel he deserves - support. Or that he'd be even more dangerous with no fixed abode. Or that it would be legal discrimination if they didn't. Who knows..
Depriving someone of their liberty because they are a danger to themselves and/or to other rightly has a very high bar, but Barbie Kardashian has been violent, has threatened horrific acts of violence, he looks like that, he acts like that, he has been a victim of violence himself..
What will it take?