Nonbinary citizen to take gender recognition legal challenge to the European Court of Human Rights

[IwantToRetire]

The Gender Recognition Panel, responsible for assessing applications under the GRA, determined that Ryan had met the criteria required, but refused to issue Ryan with a GRC stating their gender was nonbinary. Since then, they have fought their case through a judicial review, challenged the decision in the Court of Appeal in January this year, and applied for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court in April, just two months later.

Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected in July on the grounds that the application did not raise an arguable point of law.

Now, Ryan and their legal team are looking to file an application to the ECtHR invoking the right to gender recognition under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to respect for private and family life. This article has been applied to similar cases where other applicants brought a case for legal recognition of their gender.

If the ECtHR finds a violation of the law, it would then file to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, which reviews the execution of the Court’s judgments. This could include ensuring that Ryan achieves legal recognition of their gender in the UK by way of a GRC.

Ryan and their legal team claim that a successful outcome could set a precedent in Europe for legal gender recognition for nonbinary individuals.

https://www.leighday.co.uk/news/news/2025-news/nonbinary-citizen-to-take-gender-recognition-legal-challenge-to-the-european-court-of-human-rights/

(I think there may have been threads about this person before!)

Somebody on another thread suggested that 'gender identity', if it exists at all, could best be described as one's personal aesthetic.
How you like to present yourself to the world.
Your personal style.

So you can be either a man or a woman, decided by biological sex, and you should have all the human rights that are due to you as a man or a woman. Equality laws are there to protect those rights.

Your personal aesthetic, your style, how you 'present' to society may conform to stereotypes of how men are, or how women are, or you can have your own personal style, which is a mix of both, or neither - a non-binary personal aesthetic, which is separate from your biological sex.

I'd like the Court to tell Ryan that Ryan is free to follow socially constructed stereotypes of masculinity and femininity, or to decline them and construct Ryan's own personal aesthetic, there even may be a Legal Latin phrase they can quote that translates as 'You want to be non-binary? knock yourself out!'
but I think that should be considered a private matter.
Everybody should be guaranteed their human rights, but how the individual citizen presents themselves/relates to/lives their immutable biological sex is up to them, not the courts.

That's if I ruled the world - I'll start with Europe😁

No they didn't. Ryan posted 5 days ago that the ECHR had accepted the filing of their claim, which means it will now progress to the review stage.

It’s not the word gender, it’s the word identity that causes all the issues.

Sex = sex
gender = sex stereotypes
gender identity = all the linguistic gender nonsense above.

Gender is conceptually different from sex. It means something different.

Can you link to that

They are on blusky @YouCantProveIt

Every time you think surely we’ve now plumbed the depths of this shite along comes something else. Fucking arsehole

You never provide any links so we have no way of knowing whether you are spouting lies or not. On balance if you can't be arsed to follow the normal forum etiquette & provide supporting evidence then I just discount your posts.

Perhaps copy, cut, paste is woman’s work?