Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Would it be wrong to only pay half of DS school trip cost?

262 replies

Shirtbuttons26 · Yesterday 14:06

DS is going on a school trip. Its costing 45.00. Would it be wrong if I only paid 20.00 /25.00? I am on a low income and I'm juggling things a bit at the moment. I have another child at the school as well so I have been paying out for 2 children.

The school rang me saying i need to pay by tomorrow.

It does say contribution but I feel wrong for even thinking about it.

OP posts:
caringcarer · Today 01:04

Ask if you can pay in 3 installments. That would only be £15 per month. Most schools will agree to this.

caringcarer · Today 01:11

Shirtbuttons26 · Yesterday 22:50

I have never had my nails done. I don't smoke or drink. I have not been to a hair dresser in over 8 years.

Ignore these nasty comments OP.

oliil4l · Today 02:38

I don't think you're wrong for considering it. These costs really do add up, especially with more than one child at school. If it says contribution then I would speak to the school honestly rather than stretching yourself too far. Schools are usually very aware that families have different circumstances, and there may be support available or they may be able to accept what you can afford. I wouldn't feel embarrassed about asking, lots of parents find these extra costs difficult.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Notsurenotsurenotsure · Today 05:53

Jokestar · Yesterday 20:08

@Notsurenotsurenotsure
School trips are supposed to be state funded, that’s why the wording ‘contribution’ is used. They are not allowed to ask parents to pay for trips as they constitute as part of the curriculum.
Parents can however ‘contribute’ as much as they want or can afford.

To other posts who suggest the PTA help fund these trips, they are not allowed. The role of the PTA is to ensure the whole benefits from these funds, not individual children.

But practically the funds aren't there, and if parents don't pay then the trips don't go ahead.

Sartre · Today 07:03

Brokentoes85 · Today 00:27

Ajouldnt be running trips that parents can't afford or they can't afford to run.

It’s £45, not £450. Primary trips are always pretty reasonably priced, even the residential at the end of year 6 is about £200 max. It’s when they get to secondary and run a £1500 trip to New York for GCSE history for THREE DAYS not including food it gets ridiculous.

I don’t know if you answered this already but how long have you known about this trip? If it was very last minute and you knew you could only afford half you should have been direct with the school about it. If you’ve had months to sort the other £22 then you’re a pisstaker.

Sartre · Today 07:03

Notsurenotsurenotsure · Today 05:53

But practically the funds aren't there, and if parents don't pay then the trips don't go ahead.

When I was at school those who didn’t pay didn’t go. One boy in my class never went on any, even the cheap ones to a local art gallery where you only paid for the coach.

Moonnstarz · Today 07:05

Sartre · Today 07:03

It’s £45, not £450. Primary trips are always pretty reasonably priced, even the residential at the end of year 6 is about £200 max. It’s when they get to secondary and run a £1500 trip to New York for GCSE history for THREE DAYS not including food it gets ridiculous.

I don’t know if you answered this already but how long have you known about this trip? If it was very last minute and you knew you could only afford half you should have been direct with the school about it. If you’ve had months to sort the other £22 then you’re a pisstaker.

Depending on area, £45 is a lot of money.
As I posted, I work in a school and the trip they planned to do was decided against as it would have cost around £20 and it was viewed that parents would not be able to afford this. Instead we will be staying local and walking.

I think your residential price might also be outdated. Ours is £350 but could be paid through a payment plan. Pupil premium could pay half.

Sartre · Today 07:09

Moonnstarz · Today 07:05

Depending on area, £45 is a lot of money.
As I posted, I work in a school and the trip they planned to do was decided against as it would have cost around £20 and it was viewed that parents would not be able to afford this. Instead we will be staying local and walking.

I think your residential price might also be outdated. Ours is £350 but could be paid through a payment plan. Pupil premium could pay half.

My DC went on one in 2022 and it was £200 for 4 days which I didn’t balk at remotely, paid in instalments as well across 6 months.

Morelovelyandtemperate · Today 07:32

PinkEasterbunny · Yesterday 14:34

Well you need to speak to the school. Many will have a fund to help with trips if people genuinely can't afford it, but I think it's pretty cheeky to just pay £25 less and not even discuss it. Who do you expect to pay?

So if I fancy a Ferrari, but due to my income can only pay half of it, that's ok then? Exactly the same principle.

Obviously Ferrari does deals, you think rich Arabs just buy a car without doing a deal?
But £45 isn't a top end school trip.
A better example would be buying a T-shirt from Primark and asking for a discount.
They would say no.

SkinnyOatFlatWhiteForMePleaseBarista · Today 07:35

Sartre · Today 07:03

When I was at school those who didn’t pay didn’t go. One boy in my class never went on any, even the cheap ones to a local art gallery where you only paid for the coach.

That’s heartbreaking.

Shirtbuttons26 · Today 07:47

Sartre · Today 07:03

It’s £45, not £450. Primary trips are always pretty reasonably priced, even the residential at the end of year 6 is about £200 max. It’s when they get to secondary and run a £1500 trip to New York for GCSE history for THREE DAYS not including food it gets ridiculous.

I don’t know if you answered this already but how long have you known about this trip? If it was very last minute and you knew you could only afford half you should have been direct with the school about it. If you’ve had months to sort the other £22 then you’re a pisstaker.

Year 6 was 380 for the residential this year, they stay away 2 nights it used to be 4 nights away. Our average trips used to be 15.00 to 20.00/25.00 at most.

Also your talking about your own situation. Maybe 45.00 isn't to much for you. But it is for me.

OP posts:
80smonster · Today 07:53

ClairDeLaLune · Yesterday 23:44

Were you proud of yourself when you wrote this post @80smonster? Well you shouldn’t be. It’s one of the nastiest things I’ve seen on here, and it’s had some stiff competition. OP has said her second child has special needs so she can’t work. Don’t you think that that would bring about a big change in her financial situation? Also she doesn’t mention the DC’s father. Maybe he left them all. Maybe he doesn’t contribute. Maybe he died.

Go away and have a long hard think about how you can be a nicer person in the future.

OP, YANBU. I’m sure if you explain the situation to the school they will be able to help you out. Hope your DC enjoys the trip.

You’ve just said the second child has special needs, but that doesn’t change that the first was unaffordable, meaning why was there a 2nd child at all. Some people aren’t able to apply basic mathematics to work out if they can or can’t afford children. Is it ok for me to pay half my mortgage? Half my tax bill to HMRC? Half my British Gas invoice? What else can I pay half of? People are putting themselves in unnecessary financial hardship through poor decision making. Then other tax payers are forced foot the cost.

Shirtbuttons26 · Today 08:03

80smonster · Today 07:53

You’ve just said the second child has special needs, but that doesn’t change that the first was unaffordable, meaning why was there a 2nd child at all. Some people aren’t able to apply basic mathematics to work out if they can or can’t afford children. Is it ok for me to pay half my mortgage? Half my tax bill to HMRC? Half my British Gas invoice? What else can I pay half of? People are putting themselves in unnecessary financial hardship through poor decision making. Then other tax payers are forced foot the cost.

You honestly think that i can see into the future. That i knew there would be a COL crises. That I would have a child with special needs ?

OP posts:
lessglittermoremud · Today 08:06

picklepottle · Yesterday 21:57

in our primary and secondary, children on pupil premium (so FSM) get all trips for half price. I just assumed this would be the same in all schools. Is it not? It’s explained in the info letters / emails we get about trips.

It’s not in either of my Son’s secondary schools, it isn’t allocated against trips at all but used elsewhere.
I guess the main difference in secondary is that they don’t tend to day trips, they do an activities week with a range of things to do that week, from things the school put on for free like a forensics workshop etc to trips in this country/abroad for those that wish to do those and can afford to pay.
In our primary school usually the trip letters will say if your child in in receipt of pupil premium please contact the office directly to discuss, it also gives parents a chance to overpay by overpaying on the app if they want to, so trips usually go ahead because different ‘pots’ of money are used to fund it.

hotfloor · Today 08:16

Schools blatantly break the law on this all the time because money is short. Google Charging for School Activities. From what you’ve said, you do not have to pay at all.

Noshadowsinthedarkness · Today 08:29

I think you’re getting a hard time here OP, what a difficult situation for you.

As you plan, email and explain it’s too significant a cost at the moment. I don’t think they should expect everyone to have £45 spare and they will have a fund for this. I do think schools use these tactics as I imagine they struggle with some people opting not to pay, which isn’t your situation.

Mumsnet isn’t always the best place for things like this, as people have a warped perception of what is a ‘lot’ of money.

I know it’s hard going with a SEN child too, sending strength!

fashionqueen0123 · Today 08:31

Shirtbuttons26 · Yesterday 23:17

I have never been told this, or reductions.

Go and ask!

80smonster · Today 08:34

Shirtbuttons26 · Today 08:03

You honestly think that i can see into the future. That i knew there would be a COL crises. That I would have a child with special needs ?

If £45 is the issue, I think you knew how tight it would be and had another child because it suited you. Families need to be responsible for the situations they create. If they can’t be, the UK will go bankrupt as so few are culpable for the costs. This isn’t about being spiteful, its practicality.

Cheeseandolivesplease · Today 08:41

@PyongyangKipperbang My son had all of these, as many children do. He still didn't need any "extras."
If you wanted to pay for them yourself our of your wages then of course that's up to you; but they are luxuries and not necessities.

Shirtbuttons26 · Today 08:47

80smonster · Today 08:34

If £45 is the issue, I think you knew how tight it would be and had another child because it suited you. Families need to be responsible for the situations they create. If they can’t be, the UK will go bankrupt as so few are culpable for the costs. This isn’t about being spiteful, its practicality.

🤦‍♀️ I'm not even going to reply.

OP posts:
rainbowstardrops · Today 08:56

MissBeans83 · Yesterday 14:57

The trip does go ahead. That is a common tactic used by schools to bully people.

This simply isn’t true. My son’s school trip was cancelled because there weren’t enough ‘contributions’.
I imagine it depends on the school and whether they had the means to sub the shortfall.

Nursemumma92 · Today 09:09

80smonster · Today 08:34

If £45 is the issue, I think you knew how tight it would be and had another child because it suited you. Families need to be responsible for the situations they create. If they can’t be, the UK will go bankrupt as so few are culpable for the costs. This isn’t about being spiteful, its practicality.

Why are you continuing to kick the OP when she is down? Her second child has additional needs and she has been forced to give up work to care for them. How hard is that for you to understand? £45 on top on month bills can be a lot of money for a working household also, you must lead a very privileged life to not see how people can struggle in life.

Imseriouslyyouguys · Today 09:12

MrsJeanLuc · Yesterday 23:02

People shouldn't have to pay.
It's the school's job to plan for trips within their budget. Asking parents to contribute is fine, but ultimately it's the school's job to budget properly and not apply emotional blackmail.

Edited

You clearly have no idea about the massive shortfall in school budgets. If parents don’t contribute then trips can’t happen - there’s barely enough money to pay teachers!

dancehysterical151 · Today 09:38

MissBeans83 · Yesterday 14:57

The trip does go ahead. That is a common tactic used by schools to bully people.

Bully people? Huh?

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · Today 09:48

Sartre · Today 07:03

When I was at school those who didn’t pay didn’t go. One boy in my class never went on any, even the cheap ones to a local art gallery where you only paid for the coach.

So very sad. I wonder if the schools understand that every trip they plan - as another exciting and educationally enriching opportunity for the kids whose parents can afford it - is also yet another kick in the teeth to the poor kids and something else for them to be upset about having to miss out on, and maybe even bullied for?